Copyright © 2015 - 17 euexit.com. All rights reserved.
EU Myths 2 Page 2
Taking over the Member States is Not a Myth
The EU intends to take over the nation states of Europe, asset strip them and bring them under direct control from Brussels - as it has already done with Greece
The means by which this is currently being accomplished elsewhere in the EU is by first making the nation states multicultural, in order to undermine their national identities, Christian traditions and homogeneity, (a UN-EU Policy; advocated by Peter Sutherland - former EU Commissioner, Special Representative for International Migration / former Chairman of Goldman Sachs).
In doing so their settled populations will be marginalised, and the member state destabilised, and it will be easier to bring them under the control of a single government, in Brussels (Berlin).
This is also a quicker method of taking over control of the nation states than using economic force alone which can lead to a long drawn out and messy take over (Greece) which has become the first Eurozone country to entirely lose its sovereignty to the EU.
Still think you would be safer in the EU?
The actual EU “Club” rules are spelled out in the Lisbon Treaty (2007), upon which no country, apart from Eire, in Europe has held a Referendum, simply because it contains the text of the earlier rejected “Constitution for Europe.” That text is distributed, effectively hidden, within the text of the Lisbon Treaty and in order for the EU leaders to ensure that no political leader would be allowed to hold a Referendum on its contents it was called a Reform Treaty, to disguise its true purpose
The Lisbon Treaty (2007) spells out the ambitions of the EU and how they are to be achieved. They are quite simply to form a Supranational State (an EU Superpower) under which all of the populations of the former European and new states will be ruled over by uniform Regulations, Directives and Laws, including their own version of Corpus Juris, in perpetuity; EU Law has supremacy over the Laws of all other countries in the EU.
Corpus Juris and British Common Law
The EU is obsessed with the idea of a Common Currency, Police Force, EU Armed Forces including harmonised Taxation; and everything else that they can get under their control. Effectively the EU will become a Dictatorship with the Laws of a Police State (Totalitarian) and it has been under construction formally, and behind the backs of most of the populations of Europe, since the Treaty of Rome (1957); and informally for a much longer period.
For the EU the Civil and Criminal system of Law is based upon Corpus Juris, though not fully developed or well tested, whereas in Britain we have a system of Common Law.
Obviously the legal systems in the UK and the EU are complex and it is not the intention to delve into the minutiae of either system, however, there are differences which are very important to point out.
Under British Common Law we are innocent until proven guilty and under the EU’s Corpus Juris style system we are guilty or thought to be guilty first.
The following small extract reveals some of the effects of the EU’s legal system:
“…across the EU, people who have not been convicted of any crime are being detained without good reason for months or even years, often in appalling conditions that make trial preparation impossible…”
“…growing numbers are being extradited under the European Arrest Warrant, only to be held for months in prison, hundreds of miles from home, waiting for trial…” see “Detained without trial: Fair Trials International’s response to the European Commission’s Green Paper on detention October 2011”
This is what happens to normal citizens, but of course any criminal will be exempt because they have a right to a family life in order to take care of "Tiddles" their Persian Pedigree cat. Normal citizens can always apply to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) though, and good luck with that and with battling the thousands of other people trying to get Justice, and assuming you're not locked away without access to anything resembling legal representation.
English Common Law
Our Common Law system does not allow such treatment, but our system is being subverted by the European Arrest Warrant (EAW), courtesy of Straw, and Blair, and if Britain votes to stay in the EU we will all be under the Jurisdiction of the EU's version of Corpus Juris.
Since 2004 anyone in the EU can file a complaint against a British Citizen or other Nationality in the EU without any evidence, and that can require the British Police to arrest that person and hand them over to the Police force of another EU country without any requirement for checking evidence or formal extradition procedure.
You should be aware that an 800-strong paramilitary police force called the European Gendarmerie Force (EGF) already exists and will be at the disposal of the EU for operations anywhere in the EU and will have permanent bases in each EU Province, with members drawn from Italy, Spain, Portugal, Romania, France and the Netherlands. See Mary Ellen Synon, November, 2010 March-Euro-police-The-shocking-powers-prosecution-EU-us.
That a British national can be thrown into a foreign prison for months or years without charge as shown above - is courtesy of Straw, Blair and New Labour, on behalf of the EU.
British Police can also be required to investigate suspected crimes on behalf of other EU countries, ever wondered why our Police are so busy? - our Police no longer have to swear an oath to our Queen and anyone from the EU can join the Police in the UK, thus destroying the concept of Police Community cohesion - again courtesy of the Blair and New labour on behalf of the EU.
Update 23rd February, 2016:Today the Daily Mail reported that Hogan-Howe had refused to apologise for the behaviour of the Police investigating allegations of historic sex abuse against Lord Bramall. The Mail went on to report that "Earlier this month Sir Bernard said police should change their approach to sex abuse claims and not automatically believe the complainant, as is the current policy." - What an astonishing claim that the British Police seem to have been hounding Lord Bramall on the basis of a policy straight out of the EU's Corpus Juris legal system, whereby the accused is assumed guilty without corroboration or independent evidence - how long before these policies are applied to any British citizen for any crime - and perhaps more importantly, are the Police acting unilaterally or are they under the direction of the EU, either directly or indirectly? Such activity by our Police is illegal under English Common Law. Clearly Britain is now getting closer to being a country under occupation by the EU.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3460404/Met-police-chief-refuses-apologise-Lord-Brammall-failed-sex-abuse-probe-claiming-s-say-sorry-for.html#ixzz411kS6VP5
Our Laws are founded on an evolutionary process of precedence with Trial by Jury and Habeas Corpus, whereby we cannot be detained without evidence, which is our birth right.
In the EU there would only be professional Judges and Lay Magistrates and is really more similar to Military Courts in occupied countries, which if we stay in the EU will apply to us. The system is one of repression - with a code established by a Dictator.
Staying in the EU will result in EU Prosecutors being stationed within the EU Provinces which in the case of Britain will have 12 Regions. These Prosecutors will have the power to imprison anyone for up to 6 months, which can be extended by 3 months, pending investigation. The European Public Prosecutor (EPP) would decide whether to investigate to establish if there is enough evidence to prosecute - totally opposite to the system in Britain.
The legal system in the EU is not fully fledged and will become more and more Draconian as it evolves, we need to get out of the EU while we still can. The other main way that the EU's version of Corpus Juris differs is in the nature of the relationship between the State and the People, these are additional threats to our Civil Liberties.
This next section is taken from www.caef.org.uk
The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights gives Brussels the right to suspend any Civil Liberty in the “general interest” of the EU, under Article 52.
In terms of Free Speech: Europol has the right to monitor anyone alleged to be xenophobic.
More worryingly Europol is only accountable to its own management in The Hague, and its officers have Diplomatic Immunity from prosecution and can initiate and become involved in criminal investigations in other EU countries
Under EU Law any act of Civil Disobedience could potentially be classified as terrorism and result in long prison sentences. Finally, for this section, the voting rights of entire governments can be suspended within the Council of Ministers and political party’s "which do not sing to the prescribed EU hymn sheet" (my wording) can be denied public finding – all courtesy of Article 7 and 191 of the Nice Treaty (2001) respectively
For more about the EU and its modus operandi (www.caef.org.uk)