Copyright © 2015 - 19 euexit.com. All rights reserved.
7th June 2018
Soros - Funding EU Open Borders
George Soros appears to have one primary objective - along with the rest of the not so Liberal Left - to bring about a world Socialist (neo - Communist*) government and he operates by allegedly facilitating the collapse of western society through funding programmes to encourage mass uncontrolled immigration and politically interfere in countries which do not subscribe to his worldview - that is to say western Democratic countries. Soros sees sovereign national borders as barriers to the free flow of people across the whole of the West - Europe and the USA; barriers which must be removed in order to fulfil his own vision of a world government.
Soros has been effectively marginalised in Hungary by President Viktor Orban for activities which are considered dangerous to the Hungary's Christian identity but he still operates elsewhere in the EU to help bring down the sovereign borders of non-EU compliant Member States - through mass migration.
Soros is not alone in his ambitions which are also common to the Fabian Society which established the UK Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) and whose coat-of-arms is a "wolf in sheep's clothing" carrying a red standard with the initial F.S - all part of a stained glass window depicting "The forging of a new world from the destruction of the existing one".
This window was commissioned by George Bernard Shaw to illustrate ambitions and modus operandi of the Fabian Society, which are: To end the existing order through stealth - using the Democratic system - and build a new one in its place; a trend throughout the Socialist organisations in the UK (LibDems, Greens, SNP (more Statist) - and many in the House of Lords etc and in most other parts of the world.
Out of interest all Labour Party Prime Ministers have been members of the Fabian Society - does this explain explain why the Labour party oversees persistent national deficits/debt crises whenever they gain power in the UK?
But it is more widespread than just the Socialist / Liberal Democratic and outright Communist political organisations it extends to the UN, the EU and some Democrats in the US. This was most clearly demonstrated during the 2015 refugee crisis - when Angela Merkel exposed the German people to a mass movement of migrants; without any authority from her political party or the German Bundestag; without consulting other Member States or even the German people themselves.
Merkel's actions were ostensibly Humanitarian - to prevent further deaths of migrants crossing the Mediterranean Sea, but it increased their number and increased the number of people smugglers; precipitated a forged Syrian / EU passport industry and allowed undocumented (those who "lost" their documents) migrants (genuine Refugees and opportunist Terrorists / Criminals) to trample across the "Sovereign" borders of EU member States into the heart of the EU itself where they spread out in order to find the best benefit systems - which is where they settled - and who could possibly blame them for that.
Meanwhile Jean-Claude Juncker jumped on the bandwagon and offered EU visas and work permits to anyone from anywhere in the world to come to the EU and settle - and this was all welcomed and encouraged by the United Nations - see later.
Merkel's actions though are not uncharacteristic behaviour for a Communist Dictator; which she is, and she continues to control the EU - just ask Macron, the Italians, Greeks, Poles and Hungarians - to name only a few and found favour with the Obama Administration.
The most damning part of the whole episode though was with the United Nations and its Chief of International Migration - Peter Sutherland - who died in January this year. Mr Sutherland contributed throughout the crisis by encouraging further mass migration from Africa into the EU, but more important was his speech to the House of Lords Migration Committee - reported by BBC reporter Brian Wheeler in 2012.
At the meeting Sutherland emphasised that the EU should do its best to "undermine the homogeneity of its Member States and make them Multicultural" on the grounds that the populations of the EU needed young immigrants in order to work to pay taxes for the pensions and care for the ageing European populations - but the following problems arise:-
If there is any mystery to Merkel's actions it lies in the fact that she knew that "Multiculturalism" would not work in 2015 any more than it did from 1960's to the present - and Germany was the primary source of that proof - so the mass migration has nothing to do with the age dependency ratio - in fact it was more likely to make things worse, rather than better.
The more likely logical explanation is that it was enacted to create problems within the EU that could only be solved by "Ever more EU" and that was the reason why the EU / UN instigated the flow of migrants into Europe in the first place.
Removing EU Borders
In 2018 it is clear that the appetite for mass migration into Europe and the US has not changed amongst the rulers of the EU, UN and political parties on the Left in the UK, some in the US and in Europe.
She later went on to state that
The problem is that the political Left use all the right words and phrases to elicit support and sympathy; but it is not genuine - after all if we were to take mass immigration to where the Labour party and the EU, UN etc., want to take it; then no-one would benefit apart from the puppet masters in the UN, EU and UK - neither the Refugees nor the indigenous population would benefit from such indulgences upon the UK taxpayer - our society would simply collapse;
it is heading that way right now following the New Labour financial mismanagement (1997 - 2010) and the continual control from the EU's so-called "Four Freedoms" together with the imposed EU Austerity as the UK attempts to abide by European Stability Mechanism (ESM) constraints on public spending (keeping within 1992 EEC(EU) deficit/debt rules) - even though we are not in the Euro - that is unless we are able to escape the EU's legal shackles.
The Labour party et al., do not differentiate between Refugees, Economic Migrants, Criminals or any others - as long as they are likely vote Labour etc., after gaining citizenship - and the EU want to ensure that all its Member States are in the same situation - borderless and vulnerable to societal collapse and ripe for "Ever more EU" unless they wake-up to the imminent danger - which they have done recently. We do not blame the Migrants or Refugees - just those who are using them as pawns - to gain power for themselves and their much lusted after super State. The UK only has two real options:
Soros in the UK
Soros entered UK politics through the organisation set up by Gina Miller - "Best for Britain", but she then left the organisation, meanwhile George Soros has invested some £500,000 in the organisation to fund a campaign to stop "Brexit" on behalf of the EU and for his own personal ambitions.
In effect, Soros is funding a campaign to bring about a second EU Referendum in the UK - an EU tactic used in Eire to overturn an original "No" vote - which successfully managed to change the minds of the Irish through guile and misdirection.
In this case Soros is anticipating such a second campaign and he is therefore spending money in advance which will not be counted as Campaign funds, since it will be spent prior to any official Campaign begins and he plans to sell the EU door-to-door to the British people through his paid activists and volunteer Socialist sympathisers. When this Soros campaign begins it should be remembered primarily what its objectives are:-
In order to counter the anticipated onslaught - which has already begun - their propaganda needs to be countered with questions about the very nature of the EU itself and how it is designed to take over the Member States and subjugate the populations of Europe - perhaps even "turn" some of Soros's supporters.
Beginning with the nature of the EU one should ask:-
We have pointed just 15 reasons why it is not in the interests of the British people to stay in the EU - without mentioning the financial side of our relationship with Brussels (Berlin) - which is designed to asset strip each Member State and impoverish their populations on route forming to a new German dominated European Empire "For the Few on the backs of the Many"
* Neo-Communist government - in the sense of Communist methods and coercive control but incorporating Capitalist principles - to enrich themselves.